Claude Code vs Cursor: Pricing Compared (2026)

I've used both Claude Code and Cursor daily for the past year. Not for benchmarks. Not for a YouTube thumbnail. For real production work — building SaaS products, shipping client projects, maintaining open source.

Here's the honest pricing comparison nobody else is giving you.

Quick Pricing Comparison: Claude Code vs Cursor (February 2026)

Let me put the numbers side by side so you can see the full picture:

	Cursor Hobby	Cursor Pro	Cursor Pro+	Cursor Ultra
Price	Free	$20/mo	$60/mo	$200/mo
Agent requests	Limited	Extended	3x Pro	20x Pro
Tab completions	Limited	Unlimited	Unlimited	Unlimited
Cloud Agents	No	Yes	Yes	Yes
Max context	No	Yes	Yes	Yes

	Claude Code (Pro)	Claude Code (Max $100)	Claude Code (Max $200)	Claude Code (API)
Price	$20/mo	$100/mo	$200/mo	Pay-as-you-go
Model	Sonnet 4.5	Sonnet + Opus 4.5	Sonnet + Opus 4.5	Any model
Extended Thinking	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Usage	~40-80h/week	5x Pro	20x Pro	Unlimited (you pay)
Context window	200k tokens	200k tokens	200k tokens	200k tokens

At a glance, they look similar at the $20 and $200 price points. But the details matter a lot more than the price tags.

What You Actually Get at Each Price Point

The Free Tier: Cursor Wins by Default

Cursor Hobby (Free): You get limited agent requests and tab completions. Enough to try it out, not enough to build anything serious.

Claude Code (Free): Doesn't exist. Claude Code requires at minimum a Pro subscription ($20/mo) or API credits. If you want the full breakdown of free options, I wrote about whether Claude Code is free and what the alternatives look like.

Winner: Cursor. If you have literally zero budget, Cursor lets you try AI coding. Claude Code doesn't.

The $20/Month Tier: Different Tools, Same Price

Cursor Pro ($20/mo): Unlimited tab completions, extended agent limits, cloud agents, maximum context windows. This is where Cursor becomes a real tool. You get access to Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini models — all within the IDE.

Claude Code Pro ($20/mo): Full terminal-based agent with Sonnet 4.5, Extended Thinking, Research Mode, and roughly 40-80 hours of weekly usage. No IDE integration — it's a CLI tool that reads your codebase and makes changes directly.

Here's what matters at this price point:

• Cursor Pro is better for autocomplete, quick edits, and staying inside your IDE
• Claude Code Pro is better for complex multi-file changes, autonomous task execution, and deep reasoning

I can't tell you which $20 is "better" because they do fundamentally different things. Cursor augments your IDE. Claude Code is an independent coding agent.

The Mid-Tier: Where Things Get Interesting

Cursor Pro+ ($60/mo): Everything in Pro with 3x usage across all models. If you've been hitting limits on Pro, this is the fix.

Claude Code Max ($100/mo): This is where Claude Code pulls ahead for me. You get 5x more usage than Pro plus full Opus 4.5 access. Opus is Anthropic's most capable model — it handles architecture decisions, complex debugging, and multi-step reasoning that Sonnet struggles with.

For $40 more than Cursor Pro+, you get access to a fundamentally better model (Opus 4.5) instead of just "more of the same." That's the key difference.

The $200/Month Tier: Power Users Only

Cursor Ultra ($200/mo): 20x usage on all models, priority access to new features. For developers who live in Cursor all day.

Claude Code Max $200 ($200/mo): 20x usage, Opus 4.5 included. Practically unlimited for most workflows.

At this tier, both are targeting the same user: someone who codes 8+ hours daily and can't afford to hit rate limits. The choice comes down to whether you want IDE-integrated AI or a terminal-based agent.

The Hidden Costs Nobody Talks About

This is where the real comparison gets messy.

Cursor's Usage-Based Billing Surprise

In 2025, Cursor switched from request-based to usage-based billing. This was a big deal. Under the old model, you got X requests per month and that was it. Now, complex prompts consume more of your allowance than simple ones.

What does this mean in practice? Heavy users on Cursor Pro regularly report running out of credits mid-day. A complex agentic task that touches 20 files can burn through more usage than 50 simple autocomplete suggestions.

If you're a "light" Cursor user (autocomplete + occasional chat), Pro at $20/mo is fine. If you're using agents heavily, budget for Pro+ ($60) or Ultra ($200).

Claude Code's Rate Limits

Claude Code Pro limits are more predictable but still real. I typically get about 40-80 hours per week of Sonnet usage. When you hit the limit, you wait — there's no "buy more" button on the subscription plans.

The escape hatch? API credits. You can switch Claude Code to use your API key instead of the subscription. Sonnet 4.5 costs $3/million input tokens and $15/million output tokens. On heavy days, I've burned through $50-100 in API costs. But at least I chose to, instead of being surprised.

Context Window: The Invisible Cost

This is the one nobody benchmarks but everyone feels:

• Cursor: Effective context is roughly 10-20k tokens per interaction, depending on the model and mode
• Claude Code: 200k token context window, and it uses it aggressively

Why does this matter? Because context is accuracy. When Claude Code reads your entire codebase (or a significant chunk of it), the suggestions are architecturally coherent. When Cursor works with a smaller context slice, you sometimes get suggestions that conflict with code it hasn't seen.

This isn't a Cursor "bug" — it's a trade-off. Smaller context means faster responses and lower cost per request. Larger context means slower but more accurate results.

For a small project, the difference is negligible. For a monorepo with 50,000+ lines? It's the difference between useful and useless.

Which One Is Right for You?

Solo Developer, Tight Budget

Go with Cursor Pro ($20/mo). You get autocomplete, agent chat, and IDE integration. It's the lowest-friction way to add AI to your workflow. If you later want Claude Code's deeper reasoning, you can add it.

Solo Developer, Serious Projects

Claude Code Pro ($20/mo) + Cursor Hobby (free). Use Claude Code for the heavy lifting — feature development, refactors, debugging. Use Cursor's free tier for quick autocomplete while you type.

Full-Time Professional Developer

Claude Code Max ($100/mo). The Opus 4.5 access alone justifies the price. When you're stuck on a complex architecture problem, Opus solves it in one prompt where Sonnet takes 5+ iterations. At professional billing rates ($50+/hour), the time saved on Opus problems alone covers the subscription cost.

If you also want IDE autocomplete, add Cursor Pro ($20/mo) for a $120/mo total.

Team or Agency

Claude Code Max ($100-200/mo per developer) + Cursor Teams ($40/user/mo). Different people on your team will prefer different tools. Standardize on one for team workflows (Cursor Teams has shared chats and rules), but let individual developers use Claude Code for complex solo work.

Budget-Conscious but Ambitious

Claude Code with API credits only. No subscription — just pay for what you use. Load $20 in API credits and see how far it takes you. Some weeks you'll spend $5. Others, $50. But you're never locked into a monthly fee.

Can You Use Both? (Yes, and Here's When)

I run both daily and I'm not ashamed of it. Here's my actual workflow:

1. Cursor for autocomplete and quick inline edits — renaming variables, adding imports, small fixes
2. Claude Code for feature development — multi-file changes, new components, complex debugging
3. Claude Code with Opus for architecture — system design, API contracts, complex refactors across 10+ files

The cost: roughly $120/month (Claude Code Max + Cursor Pro). Expensive? Sure. But I ship in a day what used to take me a week. The ROI math isn't even close.

When using both doesn't make sense: If you're a part-time developer or working on a single small project, pick one. The overlap doesn't justify $120/month unless you're billing for your time professionally.

The Real Question: What's Your Time Worth?

Both tools save time. The question is how much time, and what that time is worth to you.

Your hourly rate	Hours saved/day	Monthly value	Tool cost	ROI
$25/hr	1 hour	$500	$20 (either Pro)	25x
$50/hr	2 hours	$2,000	$100 (Claude Max)	20x
$75/hr	2 hours	$3,000	$120 (both tools)	25x
$100/hr	3 hours	$6,000	$200 (both Ultra)	30x

Even at the most conservative estimate ($25/hr, 1 hour saved), the ROI is 25x. At professional rates, it's absurd.

For the full pricing breakdown of every Claude Code tier and the ROI math, check my complete Claude Code pricing guide.

My Recommendation (February 2026)

If I had to pick one tool today:

Claude Code Max at $100/month. The Opus access, Extended Thinking, 200k context window, and autonomous agent capabilities put it ahead for serious development work. Cursor is excellent at what it does, but Claude Code handles the tasks that actually slow me down.

If budget is the primary concern: Claude Code Pro at $20/month. Same agent, same context window, same Extended Thinking — just less usage and no Opus. For 2-4 hours of daily use, it's plenty.

And if you want to master Claude Code and squeeze every dollar of value from your subscription, I built an entire course around exactly that.

---

Last updated: February 2026. Pricing changes frequently — verify at cursor.com/pricing and anthropic.com for current rates.